- User Since
- Mar 20 2019, 8:23 PM (29 w, 5 d)
Sat, Oct 12
major point of discussion around the nonce
we should hold off on this until @sashank makes forward progress with the date-time partitioning next week (tied to the scheduler). i think "Execution time" sounds like the time that the computation is occuring. I.e. if the computation were happening on oct-1 but processing the data from sept 15, I would guess that "Execution time" means oct 1, which is the opposite of this as I understand it.
Fri, Oct 11
would prefer to see startswith shenanigans go away
this is much less invasive than anticipated 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
with your new stuff I don't think this is necessary
use diff approach per in-person convo
this is pretty great. i just think we can just go for it and get rid of bool flag
opt-in bool just because it's experimental? seems like we want this or we don't.
looks good but some tests would be good
Thu, Oct 10
Wed, Oct 9
can you post screenshot?
thx my b.
This is what happens on the runs page on master right now
Tue, Oct 8
Mon, Oct 7
Would love to see jaffle test working with this in follow on diff.
our first off-by-one error!
Sun, Oct 6
Can you also add that this fixes this issue in the release notes for 0.6.1?
Fri, Oct 4
you can be so clever with buildkite
Thu, Oct 3
yeah let's not mutate requirements.txt
yeah i started an issue to track https://github.com/dagster-io/dagster/issues/1804