User Details
- User Since
- Mar 20 2019, 8:25 PM (108 w, 4 d)
- Roles
- Administrator
Fri, Apr 16
i think this is a clear step forward even if its json sample in yaml land dagit
should any docs or tutorials get updated in this diff as well?
sweet thanks much
Thu, Apr 15
copy refresh - support dagster pipeline execute
oh wait - whats the testing story for IO managers? Do we expect users to create these by hand in test scenarios ? We might need to the typing.NamedTuple with __new__ version
switch the NamedTuples to still have __new__ but be typed
want @yuhan to sign off on this one
being annoying but i think its worth
land late tonight / early tomorrow for max soak between now and next release
😗 👌
Wed, Apr 14
typo
rebase, do some refactoring and leave useful comments explaning current setup
Tue, Apr 13
lint
just lint issues which i will fix
To be clear in vanilla solids you still have to raise these right?
Mon, Apr 12
- add comments / docblocks to the context classes explaining the thought in the current structure
- make sure to turn on integration tests too
Fri, Apr 9
definitely loving this direction - I think we can trim even further as highlighted with some inline comments
definitely worth adding comments to all the classes
seems reasonable to me
to your queue
I think it should be possible to update the test callsites to make sure a snapshot is recorded - likely to be a net improvement to the system depending on where you can enable it.
Thu, Apr 8
more tests and comments
ya let me take another pass at this
+ the system.py changes
quick drive by thoughts
- since hooks happen in process I think we should have the actual exception object available on failure
- I think we should probably have all the events from the step available, then maybe utilities for finding the success/failure hook from the full list
Wed, Apr 7
ExecutorProcessSetting giving you pause?
mypy only does static type checking, so we still need runtime checking. We still want to use check for validating values as they enter the program from external sources, like what users pass in or what we deserialize out of storage or from cross process communication.
requesting review to get more takes on release sooner vs later as well as on the user facing messages
I wasn't sure if this would be kosher for a minor release - I expect things shouldn't break but theres a small chance someone is depending on it. I could mention DagsterInstance.ephemeral() in the message.
thanks
Tue, Apr 6
rebase, feedback