As the title.
- I originally left out the workspace.yaml for simplicity's sake. What are you thoughts on why to add the workspace.yaml?
- In the case that we keep the workspace.yaml, it'd be good to update the README to add a description in the Contents table and have instructions on how use the workspace.yaml.
@bob I think being able to just run dagit instead of dagit -m PACKAGE.repository would be nice for ergonomics (since the workspace file is automatically discovered). We already surface the fact that we are using -m to load user code. The workspace.yaml is just the de-facto place for all of these concerns, so I don't think it will add more complexity.